|
Slaves of Steel
Worse than Cattle
Ineffective Action
Environmental Degradation
Modern Times
Company Profiles
Company responses
Social Responsibility
Update:
Companies
to sign agreement against slave labor
(August 13, 2004)
|
Slaves of Steel
Pig iron and environmental degradation
Iron manufacturers have a tremendous need for charcoal. To produce
one ton of pig iron, they must burn 2.6 tons of lumber, explained
researcher from the Center for High Studies in the Amazon Maurílio
de Abreu Monteiro. With pig iron production in the Brazilian North
in 2003 at 2.2 million tons, this represents the burning of 5.7
million tons of lumber. "This is an intensive process of low
energy efficiency, which requires a great amount of charcoal.
"Only a small portion of the wood used comes from reforested
areas, the rest is native forest", he explained. Charcoal performs
two functions in pig iron production: as a fuel to generate the
heat necessary to operate the iron furnace and as a chemical agent
to remove the oxygen during the process. Pig iron from the Amazon
is considered the best in the world because it uses vegetable and
not mineral charcoal. Mineral coal contaminates the pig iron with
high levels of sulfur, impeding its use for production of special
steels, those largely used in the automotive industry.
In the 1980's, when the first iron foundries were
established, the companies said that charcoal would be obtained
from large reforested areas. This did not occur, because it is much
cheaper to make charcoal from native trees. The vegetable charcoal
is an important factor in the production costs of pig iron. It represents
more than one third of the final price of the product. In June,
a ton of pig iron sold for US$ 142, of which US$55 corresponded
to the cost of coal.
"It is the raw material through which the iron
companies control the profit margin", he explained. A change
in the situation in the charcoal producing operations requires more
than good will. It requires a new economic configuration in the
steel industry, which also considers the social and labor costs
of vegetable charcoal production. The researchers pointed out the
consequences of the use of the raw material on a large scale: predatory
exploitation of natural resources; poor organization of urban spaces;
the spread of rural tensions and land conflicts; low-pay labor and
unhealthy conditions.
Iron and poverty
The production system used by the iron companies in the Amazon
reinforces an archaic system, based on large landholdings known
as latifundios, terrible social and sanitary conditions, low pay,
tax exemptions and the absence of investments that benefit the local
community.
This is the conclusion of the Study "Iron production in Brazil´s
Eastern Amazon" published by researcher Maurílio de
Abreu Monteiro. In the 1980's the Brazilian government launched
a development policy that sought to industrialize and modernize
the Amazon region. The process took place thanks to the effects
on the chain generated by the construction of an export-based industrial
complex. But the strategy did not work.
According to the study, the principal economic link of the companies
to the region is limited to the demand for vegetable charcoal. Despite
the fact that the production of pig iron has increased annually,
a contradictory situation arose. Monteiro wrote: "The number
of direct jobs generated is small if compared to the population...and
cannot stimulate significant change in relation to the regional
labor market".
Another factor cited by the researcher, is that tax income from
the activity also has not been expressive. "The tax exemptions
on the profits of the enterprises and on the sale of their products
significantly reduce the volume of taxes paid by these companies".
Maurílio calculated that there are between 20 thousand and
23 thousand charcoal furnaces operating in the Amazon charcoal producing
regions. To operate them, from 10-12 thousand workers are needed.
In 2003, the region produced 1.7 million tons of vegetable charcoal.


|
This report is part of the publication "Observatório
Social Em Revista" - # 6 - June 2004 - Florianópolis,
Brazil
English version: Jeffrey Hoff
Published by Observatório
Social
|